Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 F.2d 983 - Christine M. Grunewald, Individually and as of the Will of Henry W. Grunewald, Deceased v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Missouri Corporation

Christine M. Grunewald, Individually and as of the Will of Henry W. Grunewald, Deceased v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Missouri Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

331 F.2d 983 · 1964

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
7
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Rutledge v. Electric Hose & Rubber Co. (1975), Mekdeci v. Merrell National Laboratories (1983)

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

2201964197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Rodriguez v. New York · Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Costello v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'only in extreme cases in which it clearly appears that the moving party was free of negligence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is equally well settled ... that in a civil case an attorney's withdrawal does not give his client an absolute right to a continuance. This, too, is a matter for the court's discretion.... [A] trial court's refusal to grant a continuance will not be disturbed on appeal unless abuse of discretion is demonstrated. 75 * * * 76 * * * 77”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.