Butler v. Social Security Administration’s Empirical Analysis
331 F.3d 1368 · 2003
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Tunik v. Merit Systems Protection Board (2005), Coradeschi v. Department of Homeland Security (2006)
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 3105 · 5 U.S.C. § 5372 · 5 U.S.C. § 7512 · 5 U.S.C. § 7521 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc. · Maddox v. Merit Systems Protection Board · National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc. v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs · Monasteri v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to a position other than that of an administrative law judge.” Id. at 1373 . While a claim for constructive removal was raised before the Board by the petitioner in Butler, the petitioner”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the action taken by the [Social Security Administration] in divesting the petitioner of his Hearing Office Chief duties did not reduce the petitioner's grade or pay.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The actions covered by this section are— (1) a removal; (2) a suspension; (3) a reduction in grade; (4) a reduction in pay; and (5) a furlough of 30 days or less[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.