Sandra Blakes, on Behalf of Lamanuel Wolfe, Jr., a Minor v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
36
cited by 36 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited
2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Sullivan v. Zebley · Sarchet v. Chater · Herron v. Shalala · Steele v. Barnhart · Powers v. Apfel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The claimant does not have an impairment or combination of impairments that meets or medically equals one of the listed impairments in 20 C.F.R. Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 ( 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.924 , 416.925 and 416.926). The claimant’s impairments do not meet listing 112.02 or 112.05.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Listing 112.05 (Mental Retardation) contains six sets of criteria. If an impairment satisfies the diagnostic description in the introductory paragraph and any one of the six sets of criteria, we will find that the child’s impairment meets the listing, (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We require the ALJ to build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to her conclusions so that we may afford the claimant meaningful review of the SSA's ultimate findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lizer v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.