¶1 Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Andre Lamar Collier presents arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Harrimon, 568 F.3d 531, 532 (5th Cir.2009), which held that a violation of Texas Penal Code § 38.04(b)(1) is a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, and United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir.1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir.2006), which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively to an unimposed state sentence. The Government’s motion for summary af-firmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
331 F. App'x 309
United States v. Collier
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided August 18, 2009
This page is marked noindex.
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2009-08-18
Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2010
Applies TX PE § 38.04
Relies on United States v. Candia · United States v. Brown · United States v. Harrimon
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2009-08-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →