¶1 Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Eric Wayne Barron presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir.1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir.2006), which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
331 F. App'x 327
United States v. Barron
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided August 18, 2009
This page is marked noindex.
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2009-08-18
Relies on United States v. Candia · United States v. Brown
Decided 2009-08-18