United States v. Shusterman’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
April 2019
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3613 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 28 U.S.C. § 3202 · 28 U.S.C. § 3205
Relies on United States v. Kollintzas · United States v. Ekong · United States v. Roush
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he District Court did not err in allowing garnishment as an additional means to collect the restitution judgment” notwithstanding a payment plan at sentencing). 2 . Ekong was originally issued as an unpublished opinion, but on February 21, 2008, this court granted the government's motion to publish it. 3 . Alternatively, Lockhart asks us to limit the garnishment of his disability benefits to 15%. He states that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.