Shuff v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 117 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on Bingler v. Johnson · Woddail v. Commissioner · Quast v. United States · 315 F. Supp. 34 - Wertzberger v. United States · Tobin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“studies or research primarily for the benefit of the grantor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.