Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 Ill. 240 - Zwick v. Catavenis

Zwick v. Catavenis’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably Aluminum Mills Corp. Ex Rel. Official Unsecured Creditors Committee v. Citicorp North America, Inc. (In Re Aluminum Mills Corp.) (1991), 22 Ill. App. 3d 611 - Alan Drey Company, Inc. v. Generation, Inc. (1974)

3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

901928193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kirkpatrick v. Clark · McKey v. Cochran · Allott v. Wilmington Light & Power Co. · Sprenzel v. Windmueller · Fabian v. Traeger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There may be circumstances attending conveyances and transfers to hinder, delay, and defraud creditors, which are in law denominated “badges of fraud.” They do not in themselves constitute fraud, but are rather signs or indicia from which the existence of fraud may be properly inferred as a matter of evidence. Badges of fraud are not conclusive but are strong or weak, according to their number and concurrence in the same case. They may be overcome by evidence establishing the bona fides of the transaction. Whether badges of fraud shown in the evidence are sufficient to establish the fact that the conveyance in question was fraudulent is a matter for the jury to decide,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.