Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 Md. 574 - Legislative Redistricting Cases

Legislative Redistricting Cases’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

4 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably Vieth v. Jubelirer (2004), Montgomery County v. REVERE NATIONAL CORP., INC. (1996)

4 district · 28 state decisions

200200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1971 (Civil Rights Act of 1957) · 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (§ 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1973C (§ 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965)

Relies on Baker v. Carr · Reynolds v. Sims · Thornburg v. Gingles · City of Mobile v. Bolden · White v. Regester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[Tjhere may be room under Reynolds [v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 , 84 S.Ct. 1362 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964) ] and its progeny for a plaintiff to overcome the ’10% rule’ if the plaintiff can present compelling evidence that the drafters of the plan ignored all the legitimate reasons for population disparities and created the deviations solely to benefit certain regions at the expense of others,””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting or standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied by any State or political subdivision in a manner which results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color, or in contravention of the guarantees set forth in Section 1973b (f)(2) of this title, as provided in subsection (b) of this section.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"Each legislative district shall consist of adjoining territory, be compact in form, and of substantially equal population. Due regard shall be given to natural boundaries and the boundaries of political subdivisions.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.