Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

331 N.C. 122

415 S.E.2d 732

State v. Hudson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 22, 1992

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1992-04-22

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-04-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably State v. Rose (1994), State v. Syriani (1993)

62 state decisions

500199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*159Justice WEBB

¶1concurring.

¶2I concur with the result reached by the majority but not with all its reasoning.

¶3The majority says that it was harmless error to admit Dr. Mayer’s testimony that the defendant did not exhibit the symptoms of a person in a psychotic state. I would hold it was not error to admit this testimony. A witness may testify as to the mental condition or capacity of a person if he has had a chance to observe that person although the witness is not an expert in mental disorders. See 1 Henry Brandis, Jr., Brandis on North Carolina Evidence § 127 (3d ed. 1988).

/331/nc/122 · .json · Public domain