Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 N.C. 272 - State v. Cole

State v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McKoy v. North Carolina · State v. Huff · State v. Cox · State v. Smith · State v. Tate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In this case, it was not error for the court to excuse prospective jurors after the unrecorded bench conferences on 17 July 1989. The defendant’s trial had not commenced at that time. The jurors were not excused at a stage of the defendant’s trial and the defendant did not have the right to be present at the conferences.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.