State v. Parks’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably State v. Rose (1994), State v. White (1995)
52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ake v. Oklahoma · Fisher v. Oklahoma · State v. Holden · State v. Wilson · State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a particularized showing that: (1) he will be deprived of a fair trial without the expert assistance, or (2) there is a reasonable likelihood that it would materially assist him in the preparation of his case.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“In order to make a threshold showing of specific need for the expert sought, the defendant must demonstrate that: (1) he will be deprived of a fair trial without the expert assistance, or (2) there is a reasonable likelihood that it will materially assist him in the preparation of his case. State v. Johnson, 317 N.C. at 198 , 344 S.E.2d at 778 . ... In determining whether the defendant has made the requisite showing of his particularized need for the requested expert, the court “should consider all the facts and circumstances known to it at the time the motion for psychiatric assistance is made.” State v. Gambrell, 318 N.C. 249, 256 , 347 S.E.2d 390, 394 (1986).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This Court recognized the constitutional implications of an indigent defendant’s request for expert assistance nearly a decade before the United States Supreme Court decided Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 , 84 L. Ed. 2d 53 (1985), the landmark case which guaranteed indigent defendants the right to expert assistance under certain circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rose
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.