Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 N.J. Super. 445 - Mitchell v. Procini

331 N.J. Super. 445 - Mitchell v. Procini’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cogdell v. Hospital Center at Orange · DiTrolio v. Antiles · Olds v. Donnelly · Circle Chevrolet Co. v. Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla · Mystic Isle Development Corp. v. Perskie & Nehmad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Without a jury determination of full damages, it is impossible to determine to what extent, if any, the settlement with the Cherry Hill defendants took into consideration plaintiffs contributory fault. We, therefore, conclude that plaintiff is entitled to have a jury determine the issue of Ml compensation, as well as that amount attributed to defendant’s alleged malpractice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “as to whether the matter in controversy is the subject of any other action pending in any court or of a pending arbitration proceeding, or whether any other action or arbitration proceeding is contemplated; and, if so, ... the identi[t]y [of] such actions and all parties thereto.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the limited circumstances where a lesser sanction is not sufficient to remedy the problem caused by an inexcusable delay in providing the required notice, thereby resulting in substantial prejudice to the non-disclosed party's ability to mount an adequate defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.