331 N.J. Super. 58 - State v. Farthing’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
29 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on DiCarlantonio v. United States · Sutton v. United States · Indelicato v. United States · Bullock v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. · Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a vehicle for the wholesale [introduction] of otherwise inadmissible evidence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“should not consider the hearsay statement as substantive evidence relating to the question of guilt or innocence of the accused, but only as evidence tending to support the ultimate expert conclusion of the [witness].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The principle distilled from Bankston and its progeny is that testimony relating inculpatory information supplied by a co-defendant or other non-testifying witness identifying the defendant as the perpetrator of a crime deprives the accused of his or her constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.