Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 N.W.2d 690 - Hubby v. State

Hubby v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2018 · most notably Colorado Springs Amusements, Ltd., Etc. v. Frank L. Rizzo, Mayor of Philadelphia (1976), Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp. (1984)

36 state decisions

2101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Conner · Briggs Transportation Co. v. Starr Sales Co. · Hackman v. Beckwith · Thompson v. Bohlken · I. H. Spears v. Shell Oil Company, a Corporation, and Humble Oil & Refining Company, a Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We would be too fastidious if we would decide that the trial court was unreasonable in allowing facts in the record on the same subject to be considered in rendering the opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We find an abuse of discretion when such discretion is exercised on grounds or for such reasons clearly untenable or to an extent clearly unreasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “we assume as fact an unstated finding that is necessary to support the judgment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.