State v. Barrett’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “pertaining to burglary for purposes of ORS 161.067(1). It indicates that we must determine if the legislature intended to define a single crime or two separate crimes when it enacted the first-degree burglary statute, and what elements constitute that crime (or crimes). To make that determination, we begin with the critical wording of the general burglary statute that is incorporated by reference into ORS 164.225:”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. White · 295 Or. App. 349 - State v. Cazarez-Lopez

2. “"(1) When the same conduct or criminal episode violates two or more statutory provisions and each provision requires proof of an element that the others do not, there are as many separately punishable offenses as there are separate statutory provisions ***. "(2) *** [W]hen the same conduct or criminal episode violates only one statutory provision , but involves two or more victims, there are as many separately punishable offenses as there are victims."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Gensitskiy · State v. White

3. “enter one judgment of conviction reflecting the defendant's guilt on the charge”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. White · 186 Or. App. 144 - State v. Lucio-Camargo