Ables v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 77 Okla. Crim. 51 - Weston v. State · 33 Okla. Crim. 64 - Bulls v. State · 78 Okla. Crim. 328 - Maxwell v. State · 69 Okla. Crim. 294 - Varner v. State · 69 Okla. Crim. 188 - Thomas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]his court has long recognized that rape cases have a unique character above and beyond that of any other type cases. . Ordinarily, this court is not to judge the weight of the evidence and we proclaim it to be the exclusive right of the jury, and where there is any competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury, or where the evidence is conflicting, the court will not examine the record for the purpose of ascertaining or determining the weight of such evidence and the verdict approved by the trial judge will be permitted to stand. But, on cases of this character, an exception to the general rule is recognized, and that exception is that in rape cases the appellate court will make a careful examination of the whole record to the end that it may justify the sentence imposed. .” (at page 961)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reddell v. State““ ‘ “[T]he testimony of the prosecutrix in a rape case must be clear and convincing, and where it bears upon its face inherent evidence of improbability, is contradictory, inconsistent or unreasonable, it will be held as insufficient, and under these circumstances must be corroborated to the extent of making it sufficient.” ’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Martinez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.