Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 S.C. 310 - Wall v. Keels

Wall v. Keels’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Whittley v. City of Meridian · State v. Thomlinson · Gathers v. Harris Teeter Supermarket, Inc. · Hoeffner Ex Rel. Estate of Hoeffner v. Citadel · Abofreka v. Alston Tobacco Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court shall, on motion of either party in the suit, examine on oath any person who is called as a juror to know whether he is related to either party, has any interest in the cause, has expressed or formed any opinion, or is sensible of any bias or prejudice therein....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the trial court is not required to ask all voir dire questions submitted by the attorneys.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.