Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 S.C. 491 - Doe v. Brown

Doe v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lehr v. Robertson · Epperly v. Epperly · 149 Wis. 2d 349 - In Re Paternity of JLH · Abernathy v. Baby Boy · State Ex Rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In sharp contrast to Abernathy , the family court judge in this ease found Father “young, immature, and irresponsible.” He found Father failed to meet the statutory requirements, and that his conduct upon learning of the pregnancy and during the next several months did not rise to the level necessary to meet the Abernathy standard. Although this Court is free to find the facts differently from the family court, we find the record overwhelmingly supports these findings. Epperly v. Epperly, 312 S.C. 411 , 440 S.E.2d 884 (1994).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he clear and unambiguous language of [] these statutes indicates that when the Legislature intended to exclude 'criminal parents' from the adoption process, it did so”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “sufficient prompt and good faith efforts to assume parental responsibility and to comply with the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.