Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 SO2D 388 - Lightfoot v. State

Lightfoot v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
January 1986
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. State · 262 So. 2d 655 - DeLaine v. State · 199 So. 2d 100 - State v. Cole · 336 So. 2d 65 - State v. Terry · 313 So. 2d 729 - Gilford v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . the language of the majority opinion [in State v. Terry, 336 So.2d 65 (Fla.1976)] unmistakably suggests that the Supreme Court has now returned to a strict adherence to Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla.1968) . . . . The fact that the evidence conclusively demonstrates that if a crime was committed at all it had to be the more serious crime, is irrelevant. Without saying so the Supreme Court has now apparently adopted the theory of “jury pardon” which was advanced as a minority position in Gilford [v. State, Fla., 313 So.2d 729 ], Lightfoot v. State, 331 So.2d 388 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In our opinion such judicial determination at trial level obviously takes a most critical evidentiary matter from the proper province of the jury and vests it improperly as a matter of law with the trial judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.