Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 S.W.2d 558 - Carney v. Stuart

Carney v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 1985
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Borgstede v. Waldbauer · Buehler v. Festus Mercantile Co. · Perkins v. Terminal Railroad Assn. · Kimbrough v. Chervitz · Mayfield v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whatever transpires from the standpoint of either plaintiff or defendant prior to the time that plaintiff enters into a position of imminent peril does not affect the rights of the parties thereafter.” (emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.