Jones v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
January 2021
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Agueci · Commonwealth v. Benham · United States v. Paiva · United States v. Schrock · United States v. Lawson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The alprazolam and clonazepam purchased during the second buy constituted only one transaction because they are both Schedule IV narcotics. See Commonwealth v. Grubb, 862 S.W.2d 883 (Ky. 1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“scientific identification of a substance [a]s an absolute prerequisite to conviction for a drug-related offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“based upon the shape, color, and markings, the drug visually appeared to be alprazolam”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.