Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 SW3D 433 - Shipp v. State

Shipp v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana))

Relationships

Relies on Almanza v. State · Malik v. State · Boykin v. State · Collier v. State · State v. Rosenbaum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In construing a statute, whether or not the statute is considered ambiguous on its face, a court may consider among other matters the ... legislative history!.]”). 25 . Nguyen, 2010 WL 5395820 at . 26 . Id. at . As appellant put it in his Brief,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Unless a different construction is required by the context, Sections 311.011, 311.012, 311.014, 311.015, and 311.021 through 311.032 of Chapter 311, Government Code (Code Construction Act), apply to the construction of this code.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.