Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 331 SW3D 49 - Ervin v. State

Ervin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

38 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 182nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Tibbs v. Florida · Marks v. United States · Thompson v. City of Louisville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The store clerk at trial identifies A as the robber. A properly authenticated surveillance videotape of the event clearly shows that B committed the robbery. But, the jury convicts A. It was within the jury’s prerogative to believe the convenience store clerk and disregard the video. But based on all the evidence the jury’s finding of guilt is not a rational finding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.