¶1 Norman Davis, Jr. (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
331 S.W.3d 723
Davis v. State
Decided February 22, 2011
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2011-02-22
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2014
6 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2011-02-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →