State v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Dixon · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · 143 Wis. 2d 226 - State v. Sorenson · 145 Wis. 2d 244 - State v. Fawcett · 180 Wis. 2d 502 - State v. Kurzawa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is an elementary rule of criminal law, that. . . the facts and circumstances which constitute the offense . . . must be stated with such certainty and precision that the defendant may be enabled to judge whether they constitute an indictable offense or not. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“states an offense to which he [can] plead and prepare a defense and whether conviction or acquittal is a bar to another prosecution for the same offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.