331 Wis. 2d 568 - State v. Marinez’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

cited by 32 later decisions

states following

February 2023

most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 124 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Pitsch · 34 Wis. 2d 278 - Whitty v. State · 216 Wis. 2d 768 - State v. Sullivan · United States v. Bowie · 127 Wis. 2d 247 - State v. Fishnick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that the person acted in conformity therewith.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 385 Wis. 2d 700 - State v. Joseph B. Reinwand · 384 Wis. 2d 414 - State v. Hicks
“Once the proponent of the other-acts evidence establishes the first two prongs of the test, the burden shifts to the party opposing the admission of the other-acts evidence to show that the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the risk or danger of unfair prejudice.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 385 Wis. 2d 700 - State v. Joseph B. Reinwand · State v. Lock
“relates to a fact or proposition that is of consequence to the determination of the action”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 387 Wis. 2d 686 - State v. Rivera · State v. David Gutierrez

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.