Ragar v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Sturgis v. Skokos (1998), 104 Ark. App. 364 - Rice v. Ragsdale (2009)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 6 Cal. 3d 176 - Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand · Chapman v. Alexander · Lane v. Lane · Goldsby v. Fairley · Sublett v. Hipps
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he majority of jurisdictions considering this context, regardless of the applicable rule, 6 holds that a pending appeal by the damaged party does not serve to toll the statute of limitations when damages can be presently identified.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“judgment entered in favor of the appellant,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.