Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 Ark. 398 - Humphrey v. State

Humphrey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Wright v. State (1998), Kinsey v. State (2016)

36 state decisions

1801998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yocum v. State · Turner v. State · Ricketts v. State · Johninson v. State · Peals v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person is justified in using deadly physical force upon another person if the person reasonably believes that the other person is: (1) Committing or about to commit a felony involving force or violence; (2) Using or about to use unlawful deadly physical force; or (3) Imminently endangering the person’s life or imminently about to victimize the person as described in § 9-15-103 from the continuation of a pattern of domestic abuse. (b) A person may not use deadly physical force in self-defense if the person knows that he or she can avoid the necessity of using deadly physical force with complete safety: (1)(A) Byretreating. (B) However, a person is not required to retreat if the person is: (i) In the person’s dwelling or on the curtilage surrounding the person’s dwelling and was not the original aggressor; [[Image here]] (c)As used in this section: (1) “Curtilage” means the land adjoining a dwelling that is convenient for residential purposes and habitually used for residential purposes, but not necessarily enclosed, and includes an outbuilding that is directly and intimately connected with the dwelling and in close proximity to the dwelling[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Our role is not to weigh the evidence to determine if the justification instruction should have been given. Instead, the standard requires that we limit our consideration to whether there is any evidence tending to support the existence of a defense. If there is such evidence, then the justification instruction must be submitted to the jury so that it can make the factual determination as to whether the charged conduct was committed in self-defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.