United States v. Marquez’s Empirical Analysis
332 F.2d 162 · 1964
Citation profile
29 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 1985 · most notably United States v. Knohl (1967), United States v. Deaton (1967)
29 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 145 · 26 U.S.C. § 4401 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203
Relies on Spies v. United States · United States v. Murdock · Ingram v. United States · United State v. Kahriger · United States v. Calamaro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““On balance, however, we believe the import of the Ingram decision to be that evidence of attempts to conceal the operation of a lottery by one who participates in its operation and is liable for the taxes imposed by Congress suffices to show the element of knowledge circumstantially and to justify conviction of a wilful failure to pay the tax and to register. In this, we are in accord with the great weight of authority on this topic.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.