Lieberthal v. North Country Lanes, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
332 F.2d 269 · 1964
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently March 1998 · most notably Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (1977), Thornhill Publishing Co. v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp. (1979)
47 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Yellow Cab Co. · Sweet v. United States · Page v. Work · United States v. Employing Plasterers Assn. of Chicago · United States v. Women's Sportswear Manufacturers Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . .It has frequently been held, however, that the incidental flow of supplies in interstate commerce, [citing cases] . . . the interstate travel of customers of the local enterprise . . . [citing eases] . . the solicitation of business in other states for the local enterprise . . . [citing cases] . the utilization of interstate communication media . . . [citing eases] ... or a location in an area of interstate activities [citing cases] ... do not in themselves suffice to transform an essentially intrastate activity into an interstate enterprise.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The test of jurisdiction is not that the acts complained of affect business engaged in interstate commerce, but that the conduct complained of affects the interstate commerce of such business.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The controlling consideration . . . is a very practical one-the degree of interstate activity in the particular business under review,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.