William Sustin v. Irving B. Altman’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently February 2005 · most notably United States v. Spectro Foods Corp. (1976), In the Matter of Vuitton et Fils Sa (1979)
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Herrmann v. Edwards · Grant v. United States · Continental National Bank v. Buford · Whittemore v. Amoskeag Nat Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the federal courts do not have jurisdiction over suits to recover damages for the alleged misconduct of national bank directors ... [Ajctions by or against national banks may be brought in the federal courts only where an essential element of the cause of action presents a substantial federal question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n a civil action a restraining order qua restraining order is non-appealable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.