Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 F.2d 341 - DeToro v. Pepersack

DeToro v. Pepersack’s Empirical Analysis

332 F.2d 341 · 1964

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
14
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 10 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2007 · most notably Adams v. Illinois (1972), State v. Carr (1977)

40 federal appellate · 10 district · 32 state decisions — followed in 14 states

79019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3432

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Culombe v. Connecticut · Hamilton v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In our view, Hamilton [v. State of Alabama, supra] and White [v. State of Maryland, supra] teach that an accused is denied rights afforded him under the sixth amendment when he is subjected to an arraignment or to a preliminary hearing without the assistance of counsel, where events transpire that are likely to prejudice Jiis ensuing trial.” DeToro v. Pepersack, 332 F.2d 341 , 343 (4th Cir. 1964), Cert. den. 379 U.S. 909 , 85 S.Ct. 198 , 13 L.Ed.2d 181 ; And see, United States ex rel. Cooper v. Reincke, 333 F.2d 608 (2d Cir. 1964).”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “«* * whatever may be the normal function of the ‘preliminary hearing’ under Maryland law, it was in this case as ‘critical’ a stage as arraignment under Alabama law. For petitioner entered a plea be-f°re the magistrate and that plea was taken at a time when he had no counsel. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.