Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 F.2d 561 - Hobson v. Crouse

Hobson v. Crouse’s Empirical Analysis

332 F.2d 561 · 1964

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
5
states following
August 1988
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 1988 · most notably United States v. Winter (1975), United States v. Wilson (1983)

15 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

150196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Fay v. Noia · Frisbie v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[T]he power of a court to try a person for crime is not impaired by the fact that he had been brought within the court's jurisdiction by reason of a `forcible abduction.'" Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 522 , 72 S.Ct. 509, 511 , 96 L.Ed. 541 (1952). McCord v. Henderson, 384 F.2d 135, 136 (6 Cir. 1967).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We can find nothing in Mapp v. Ohio, ibid [ 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed. 1081 ] or Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 , 83 S.Ct. 822 , 9 L.Ed.2d 837 , which impels us to take the bold step suggested by counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “under the expanded concept of due process and the availability of habeas corpus to vouchsafe it under the Fourteenth Amendment, we should overrule Frisbie v. Collins and grant the writ.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.