Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 F.2d 783 - Beeler v. Crouse

Beeler v. Crouse’s Empirical Analysis

332 F.2d 783 · 1964

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
November 2022
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2022

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

601964197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Teague v. Looney · Joseph Robert Devins v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden · Raisin v. Hunter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Habeas corpus is a civil proceeding and the burden is on the petitioner to show by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.