Lewis E. Walkup v. Harold G. Greig’s Empirical Analysis
332 F.2d 800 · 1964
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1984
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hildreth v. Mastoras · Joshua C. Conner v. George G. Joris · Arthur W. Schnick v. Lawrence E. Fenn · Tansel v. Higonnet · In re Hartop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"* * * Moreover, it is well established that subsequent conduct with respect to the invention is properly to be considered where there is doubt that the activities relied upon constitute a reduction to practice. * * " [10]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Natta · Hogan v. Zletz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.