Charles B. Swain and Albert G. Schuessler v. Bob C. Crittendon’s Empirical Analysis
332 F.2d 820 · 1964
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 1989 · most notably In re Smythe (1973), Reese v. Hurst (1981)
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Den Beste v. Martin · Loukomsky v. Gerlich · Henning v. Hunt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Krantz v. Olin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.