Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 F.2d 975 - In re Gottesman

In re Gottesman’s Empirical Analysis

332 F.2d 975 · 1964

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
October 1980
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 1980 · most notably United States v. Franks (1975), United States v. Jenkins (1974)

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

180196419701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Opper v. United States · United States v. Charnay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “will not be interfered with by way of a writ of mandamus unless a strong showing of prejudice is made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Edwards
  2. “for the purpose of pressing a premature appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Edwards

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.