Searcy v. Jaimet’s Empirical Analysis
332 F.3d 1081 · 2003
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
May 2018
most recently cited
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Lockyer Attorney General of California v. Andrade · Alford v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Trial judges retain wide latitude ... to impose reasonable limits on such cross-examination based on concerns about, among other things, harassment, prejudice, confusion of the issues, the witness' safety, or interrogation that is repetitive or only marginally relevant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Walker v. Litscher“an unlimited right to pursue any subject on cross-examination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.