Murrell v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis
332 F.3d 1102 · 2003
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2021
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Lindh v. Murphy · Bell Warden v. Cone · United States v. Tolson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘only a clear error in applying Strickland would support a writ of habeas corpus.’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“took the constitutional standard seriously and produce[d] an answer within the range of defensible positions,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Taylor v. Bradley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.