Khattak v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
332 F.3d 250 · 2003
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1160 (§ 210 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc. · Bill Martin Director Michigan Department of Correctionss v. Everett Hadix · Hallowell v. Commons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he new procedure does not alter the legal standards that are applied in reviewing the merits of appellants' claims. Rather, it affects only the body that adjudicates the claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“allowing summary opinions in clear cases is nothing more than a procedural change that does not affect substantive rights,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.