Maynard v. Nygren’s Empirical Analysis
332 F.3d 462 · 2003
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455 · 42 U.S.C. § 12205 (§ 505 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Koon v. United States · Liteky et al United States · Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), we determined, as a matter of first impression, that "considering the severe and punitive nature of dismissal as a discovery sanction, a court must have clear and convincing evidence of willfulness, bad faith or fault before dismissing a case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Of all possible sanctions, dismissal is considered `draconian,' and we must be `vigilant' in our review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the evidence does appear to support the Sheriff's positions and the district court's conclusions quite strongly,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.