¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
¶3John David Hendrickson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)® and (ii) (2006) for being frivolous and for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendrickson v. Walker, No. 1:09-cv-00562-AJT-TRJ (E.D. Va. June 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶4AFFIRMED.