332 F. Supp. 2d 149 - Boehner v. McDermott’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · County of Los Angeles v. Davis · Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts · O'Connor v. Donaldson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Gingrich Is Heard Urging Tactics in Ethics Case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“wire, oral, or electronic communication.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“that one who accepts from strangers a package with a short accompanying letter is likely to read the letter . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Boehner v. McDermott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.