Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 N.C. 487 - State v. Cummings

State v. Cummings’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
3
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably State v. Perez (2009), State v. Dean (Slip Opinion) (2015)

71 state decisions

2801992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt · Powers v. Ohio · Zant v. Stephens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The trial judge must require that the reporter make a true, complete, and accurate record of all statements from the bench and all other proceedings except: (1) Selection of the jury in non capital cases; (2) Opening statements and final arguments of counsel to the jury; and (3) Arguments of counsel on questions of law. (b) Upon motion of any party or on the judge’s own motion, proceedings excepted under subdivisions (1) and (2) of subsection (a) must be recorded.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “other crimes of violence were parts of a pattern of intentional acts directed toward the perpetration of such crimes of violence which establishes that there existed in the mind of the defendant a plan, scheme, or design involving both the murder of [the victim] and other crimes of violence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If . . . either party requests that the subject matter of a private bench conference be put on the record for possible appellate review, the trial judge should comply by reconstructing, as accurately as possible, the matter discussed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.