Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 N.C. 520 - State v. Walker

State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably State v. Hardy (1994), 139 N.C. App. 706 - State v. Aldridge (2000)

26 state decisions

180199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oregon v. Kennedy · Hankerson v. North Carolina · Houchins v. KQED, Inc. · State v. Stager · State v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is proper not only where defendant's own statements contradict each other but also where defendant's statements flatly contradict the relevant evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Now, the State contends and the defendant denies that the defendant made false contradictory of [sic] conflicting statements. If you find that the defendant made such statements, they may be considered by you as a circumstance tending to reflect the mental process of a person possessed with a guilty conscience, seeking to divert suspicion or to exculpate himself and you should consider that evidence, along with all the other believable evidence in this case; however, if you find that the defendant made such statements, they do not create a presumption of guilt and such evidence standing alone is not sufficient to a — establish guilt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`explains, clarifies or is not inconsistent with the State's evidence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.