332 N.J. Super. 200 - State v. Carty’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
November 2019
most recently cited
2 district · 23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Ohio v. Robinette · State v. Johnson · State v. Alston · State v. Dickey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that articulable suspicion is a necessary prerequisite under the New Jersey Constitution to requesting a consent to search after a routine stop for a traffic violation.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Interim Report of the State Police Review Team Regarding Allegations of Racial Profiling”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In order to help ensure that state troopers use their authority to conduct consensual motor vehicle searches in a nondiscriminatory manner, the State Police shall continue to require: that state troopers may request consent to search a motor vehicle only where a trooper can articulate a reasonable suspicion that a search would reveal evidence of a crime....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.