Rush v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2015
1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Des Moines v. Public Employment Relations Board · Board of Directors of Independent School District v. Green · Iowa Civil Liberties Union v. Critelli · Danner v. Hass · State Ex Rel. Turner v. Iowa State Highway Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The criteria for whether to apply the exception are: “(1) the public or private nature of the question presented, (2) desirability of an authoritative adjudication for future guidance of public officials, and (3) likelihood of future recurrence of the same or similar problem.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We have delineated a 'public interest’ exception to the mootness doctrine ...”); Johnston v. Ing, 50 Haw. 379, 381 , 441 P.2d 138, 140 (1968) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.