Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 332 S.C. 100 - State v. Cutro

State v. Cutro’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably State v. Wilson (2001), State v. Cheeseboro (2001)

36 state decisions

270199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lindsay v. Beneficial Reinsurance Co. · United States v. Ursery · State v. Lyle · State v. Sullivan · Gamble v. International Paper Realty Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of other crimes must be put to a rather severe test before admission. The acid test of admissibility is the logical relevancy of the other crimes. The trial judge must clearly perceive the connection between the other crimes and the crimes charged. Further, other crimes which are not the subject of conviction must be proven by clear and convincing evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.