Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

332 S.C. 87

In re Strickland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 12, 1998

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1998-08-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2003

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-08-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking to have respondent restrained from disbursing any trust or escrow account monies. Respondent has filed a return and does not oppose being placed on interim suspension but asserts that a restraining order is not necessary.

¶3IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this State is suspended until further order of the Court.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating account(s) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s).

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J./s/ Jean H. Toal, J./s/ James E. Moore, J.*88/s/ John H. Waller, Jr., J./s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J.
/332/sc/87 · .json · Public domain